They knew exactly what Jesus was saying Access to 50+ curated Special Collections. No one was copying the thought in ant way, it now was a part of each hearers memory and as such will be changed a bit by each hearer. I will want a copy of the oldest new testament it is written how Jesus says it should be. Photo: Courtesy of St. Catherines Monastery. The textus receptus is based of all older manuscripts that are fairly consistent. Any Greek representation of the New Testament is not factual as to the true text. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Hundreds of english Bible versions, and most of them are ONLY making small changes ..INSIGNIFICANT changes which over time become gradually accepted. We also understand the the religious leader of the time killed Jesus the savior and many of the Jewish people still do not believe today due to their religious leaders. I believe that by the power of the Holy Spirit the mysteries will be revealed to those who seek truth. There are 5,309 surviving Greek manuscripts that contain all or part of the New Testament. The sound foundation built by seeking knowledge and wisdom come from meditating on the word day and night and then is still a spiritual revelation of the truth of God. In other words what we have today is an incomplete Bible. How is this negative? Each issue of Biblical Archaeology Review features lavishly illustrated and easy-to-understand articles such as: Fascinating finds from the Hebrew Bible and New Testament periods, The latest scholarship by the world's greatest archaeologists and distinguished scholars, Stunning color photographs, informative maps, and diagrams, Reviews of the latest books on biblical archaeology, 45+ years of Biblical Archaeology Review, 20+ years of Bible Review online, providing critical interpretations of biblical texts. Hes giving me understanding of things Ive ask him no more in order to inherit the spiritual and incorruptible glory of A footnote on #46 above: Besides the New World Translation, the others were The Amplified New Testament, The Living Bible, The New American Bible With Revised New Testament, New American Standard Bible, The Holy BibleNew International Version, The New Revised Standard Version, The Bible in Todays English Version, and King James Version. I really enjoyed the side-by-side comparison; its clear that scribes through time have substantially modified the text. All religions are based on truth claims. Sinaiticus is one of . i say that all things will be made clear when Jesus comes back pretty soon. It was not something that they had to work out..DID HE or DIDNT HE? Constantine Tischendorf was a false teacher, like one of the ones Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Messiah, warned about. The manuscript has what is now considered the beginning of v. 55 and ending of v. 56 (rem: versification was added in 1551): But he turned and rebuked them. Thank you also for the many useful links provided. This debate has been going on for centuries and likely there will always be disagreements as to which is closer to the original Greek autographs. I find it amazing that you all believe in this nonsense. In his article Hero or Thief? He had claimed to be God equal with God, and they had tried on a number of occasions to stone HIm, just as Moses had said they should for a charge of blasphemyas long as two or three witnesses could testify. How do the >English< translations of Mark 16.1-14 match word for word in KJV and , yet don't in Matt 6.9-13? I went to a lecture give by Dr Cooper on this subject, and his evidence and the surprised response of the British Library staff at the youthful condition of the manuscripts, was very compelling. The Vaticanus and Sinaiticus manuscripts are part of this group. It appears in the Greek Codex Alexandrinus of the fifth century, the Latin Vulgate, and elsewhere. However, it is not . and unbelief is under Satan, who does not allow the truth and I am still researching this. Did God speak directly to King James I and the various groups of translators assembled by him to produce the KJV for the English-speaking world??? Where can we find proof of the existence of God? I mostly appreciate the articles but always find the comments helpful and sometimes entertaining. Mark 16:6 And he saith unto them, Be not affrighted: Ye seek Jesus of Nazareth, which was crucified: he is risen; he is not here: behold the place where they laid him. Sinaiticus contains the Epistle of Barnabas and a part of the Shepherd of Hermas, which don't belong to New Testament's texts. Please site such evidence if it exists. Thats pretty much identical to the late, great Chuck Smiths (founder of the Calvary Chapel movement) opinion. For example the Magna Carta (c.1200 AD) is so frail and desiccated that it is enclosed in a sealed environment, to prevent total disintegration. Kent says: A salvaged page of the Codex Sinaiticus from St. Catherines Monastery recovered in 1975. One other omission in Codex Sinaiticus with theological implications is the reference to Jesus ascension in Luke 24:51. One of Jesus disciples had been such a zealot. delivered over to death, that they may return to the truth and sin Details are important. William posts As Rodney King said, Cant we all just get along? Actually at least to me it does seem to be more important to be able to get along than to be right, however right is defined. That is called relativism, a scourge which has infected our culture. Whatever happened to the mummy mask discovered in Egypt with the book of Mark used for making the mask? Hardly. Stop using your cults limited understanding of morality, spirituality and limited understanding of the universe.as a template for how you should think believe. The story of John 7 is missing in the Codex S. But in other manuscripts it appears. If I have 999, 999 dollar coins, one may conclude that I am a millionaire, even I might. The simple reason for the disappearance of most manuscripts and why there are so many small fragments containing excerpts around is that they simply wore out! Ive known for a long time these differences existed, I just have never been able to figure out how these differences came to be. Amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls. his words will never pass away ! Memorization and oral transmission was the primary means of education in first century Judea and Galilee among the Jews. Of course, the implications of this, if true, are monumental. My goodness it appears that the Word of God inerrant, unchanging has many versions, and that these versions do not agree with each other. https://www.faraboveall.com/015_Textual/SinVat_Galatians.pdf Textus Receptus is Latin for "Received Text." It was used as the textual base for the vernacular translations that arose during the Reformation period. We know the Catholics hated the Bible then and even today. Also, in Matthew 6:13, Codex Sinaiticus ends the Lords Prayer with the phrase but deliver us from [the] evil [one] (which is omitted above), but the doxology (for thine is the kingdom) is absent. And no, Steve, the are thousands and thousands positives and no negatives at all. Woe to the Textus Receptus supporters. Go read the 18th chapter. The First English bible translated from Greek (not Latin) manuscripts was the Tyndale Bible (1525). Neither the original hand nor any corrector afterward in Codex Sinaiticus has the wording that Jesus was angry in Mark 1:41. That is why the copying of Bible manuscripts was such a big business. In the Lords prayer, it is well known for centuries in the church that Yours is the kingdom and power and glory were not in the original text. In the 19th century, almost all Bible translations had a spurious Trinitarian addition at 1 John 5:7. As for the resurrection in Mark or not in Mark versus Sinaiticus..I think there are endless debates over the Long Ending and the Short Ending of Mark, with scholars evenly divided in their views. omits verses with a multitude of documented quotes by the earliest Pre-Nicene Christians including converts of the Apostles Paul, Peter, and John; all of whom certainly has autograph versions of the New Testament books. After a cursory review, I count eight mistakes in this little article. if this is negative, then how is murder, rape, child abuse, greed classified? Nothing could be more errant than to write Catholics hate the Bible. This is history. Scholars in favor of the critical text of the bible, view the Codex Sinaiticus to be one of the greatest Greek texts of the New Testament and the codex is a celebrated historical treasure by many modern scholars, along with that of the Codex Vaticanus. Being in the ultimate best group (your current religion is the correct one of course) is a very powerful aphrodisiac. Additionally. They are significant. However, in 1881 scholars Westcott and Hort published a new Greek New Testament text that included the findings of Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus. The Codex Vaticanus ( The Vatican, Bibl. Please force yourself to reconsider, take time and rethink your position, and seek the TRUTH. Verse Analysis Compares the 1550 Stephanus Textus Receptus with the King James Bible. PLUS, why is it when I read the KJV for six months I experience a power, unlike anything I have ever experienced. Sinaiticus has 9000 passages differently than Textus Receptus. The All-Access membership pass is the way to get to know the Bible through biblical archaeology. They knew this. I suggest you read the Gospels with an open mind, and simply ask God, if he exists, to reveal himself to you. Clearly that must have been because they were recognised from a very early date to be unreliable to the point of theological fraud. The main texts, Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, contradict each other over 3,000 times in the gospels alone, and they disagree with the ' Majority Text' in 13,000 places. In 2003 he published a 200-page study of nine of the Bibles most widely in use in the English-speaking world.* His study examined several passages of Scripture that are controversial, for that is where bias is most likely to interfere with translation. For each passage, he compared the Greek text with the renderings of each English translation, and he looked for biased attempts to change the meaning. And Christ replied to them, The codex sin was proven to be a fraudulent in court. That is how the system works. That is the nature of deception. ; it is a blessing there are such early ones. There are over 5,800 hand written New Testament manuscripts on record which predate the Guttenburg press. Interesting article.and interesting comments. Neither does it appear in the Peshitta, thus proving that the addition at 1 John 5:7 is indeed a corruption of the Bible text. Like all of them If there is more than what is listed here on this page? Just like in the 1800s , Europe saw an infiltration into the Seminaries and Colleges by Romes agents to weaken Protestant influence for the ensuing generations and swing them back to Rome (still going on today folks), so too the work of W&H in the late 1800s brought a major shift in the thinking about how scholars should or could go about their work of translation of Scripture. W N Pickering points out that one of the major thrusts of modern versions is to undermine the authority of Scripture, by the use of enclosing parts of the text in brackets and have (ing) numerous footnotes of a sort that raise doubt about the integrity of the Text. There were several English translations published long before the KJV; to wit, Coverdale bible (1535), Matthews bible, (1537) The Great bible, (1539) Geneva Bible, (1560) Bishops Bible, (1568), et al. Battle of the Bibles on link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNv-zzpIwBs ; and Changing the Wordon link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqBEuxGY7DI. This was the greatest moment in thier lives for all there and they would have been really focused on what the ciach had to say,. BTW, the Pericope de Adultera (John 8:1 ff) was preserved in the Western canon for a thousand years before it was introduced to the Greek and Syriac canons. Anything that gets into the public arena gets trashed, but in a way it makes me happy to read all, the responses, because it tells me that there are still passionate people out there who are looking. As Rodney King said, Cant we all just get along? Actually at least to me it does seem to be more important to be able to get along than to be right, however right is defined. Each will find their own way. Galatians 4:6. Denominations and denominationalism are two different things that are not based on the integrity of the New Testament record. Subversion is often of a greater danger than frontal attack. In discussion of this codex it is discribed as perhaps the third oldest, but probably has better provenance than the other two. 1209), designated by siglum B or 03 (in the Gregory-Aland numbering), 1 ( von Soden ), is a fourth-century Christian manuscript of a Greek Bible, containing the majority of the Greek Old Testament and the majority of the Greek New Testament. I bless you in the Name of the Father, the SON and the HOLY Spirit. They cant all be simultaneously true so it is important to seek out the truth. Until you have a personal experience of being filled with the Holy Spirit, you cannot see the truth. No products in the cart. It was found in the Cairo environs with evidence of origin in the 4th or 5th century, right around the time of Athanasius but l wont jump to any conclusions. How about logic? And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. So our second question is really: why were these two unorthodox* manuscripts unused? Constantine Tischendorfs chance finding of Codex Sinaiticus, the oldest New Testament manuscript, at St. Catherines Monastery in the Sinaiand his later removal of the manuscriptmade him both famous and infamous. And for those who have sinned I was The textus receptus was essentially a slogan used by the distributors of the KJV after it was error corrected and reprinted on the printing press. Surely you know. Craig, thanks for the link to battle of the bible. Sign up to receive our email newsletter and never miss an update. Little doubts often repeated become entrenched in the mind and eventually produce either a serious warning, or a platform for lies. However, the two authoritative fourth-century Greek manuscriptsCodex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanusboth end with Mark 16:8. This cannot be an unblemished codex. Denominationalism must be blamed on our own selfish ambitions and vain conceit as Paul describes in Philippians 2.3, when we ignore Scripture as many Christians often do. https://www.gotquestions.org/Textus-Receptus.html, Good Morning Oscar heres some interesting reading that may assist with your query: In the Beginning: The Story of the King James Bible and How it Changed a Nation, a Language, and a Culture by Alister McGrath Why dont you do another article comparing all the similarities of the CS with other early manuscripts? This is also the text that agrees with more than 95% of the Bible Manuscripts in Koine (common) Greek. I am just saying. We can learn about the society where the ancient Israelites, and later Jesus and the Apostles, lived through the modern discoveries that provide us clues. The consequences of all this are serious and are far reachiing for the future of the Church.. It is known by other names, such as the Traditional Text, Majority Text, Byzantine Text, or Syrian Text. Both the Codex and the KJV Greek manuscripts show the diety of Yeshua in different ways! And then when I read a modern version of the Bible (derived from the Westcott and Hort revisions) I never experience this power or anything like it at all??? The Codex Sinaiticus (Shelfmark: London, . Then We sent after them our apostles and We sent Jesus the son of Mary, and bestowed on him the Gospel; and We ordained in the hearts of those who followed him compassion and mercy; and monasticism, they invented it. Why not do an article as well featuring Whats included in Codex Sinaiticus which includes Jesus exalted position in Revelation, being referenced as the Son of God in many other parts of the gospels, the fact that Mark leaves with someone announcing Jesus resurrection, the fact that all 4 gospels and Pauls letters are there (all of which clearly spell out Jesus deity and identity as Risen Lord)and all of this from the 4th centuryand when compared to other manuscripts and documents from early church fathers, the Codex Sinaiticus only further confirms that early Christians viewed Jesus as God? Craig Evans helped me to understand this seeming dilemma in his study the reliability of the New Testament Manuscripts. If somebody takes one of those dollar coins, it still looks like a lot money and I almost have a million dollars. GREEN, SOVEREIGN GRACE TRUST FUND. are parchment, or vellum, codices. The earliest manuscripts are consistent. you dont have to be a christian or a jew to be a good translator. Im trying to see if there has ever been any other number than 144,000 taken in the first biblical calling mentioned in Revelations. Rome couldnt get rid of all the Bibles which were being mass produced by the protestors the heretics as Rome branded them, so after a time they got busy by subversion and decided it would suit their purpose better if they worked to alter the Text of the Bible from within. The codex is an Alexandrian text-type manuscript in uncial letters on parchment. We simply dont know what to believe anymore!. COPYRIGHT 2023 BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY SOCIETY 5614 Connecticut Ave NW #343, Washington DC 20015-2604. How does it compare to the MSS? So why do these proponents never complained that these are not included in evangelical churches bible? .September 25 .2015) I read it for the prose. Nowhere does the OT say; He was with God in the beginning. the Minority Texts (primarily the Westcott and Hort Greek Text, based primarily on the Codex Sinaiticus and the Codex Vaticanus). It has commonly been argued, for at least 200 years (John Bengel, d. 1752, was the first), that no matter what Greek text one may use it will not affect any doctrine. does not allow what lies under the unclean spirits to understand But do it with a sincerely open mind. James A. Sanders, founder and president emeritus of the Ancient Biblical . You know perfectly well that the omission of these texts in no way theologically threatens any Biblical doctrine. Unlike the KJV. Theres accountability to the record. And again before the written word, the idea of memorizing what was said was not part of culture. I will always prefer the KJV with all its faults. And no less so today. He discovered the first part in 1844 and the second part in 1859. Thanks to the comment by Frank, now I am seeing where the Oneness BS concept is being derived from. And our excuse.? Those Jewish leaders I dare say would have been far more familiar with the OT than you or I have ever been. Codex Sinaiticus Our Father in heaven, Hallowed be thy name, Thy kingdom come. After 10 minutes of conversation see who remembers exactly what was said 8 minutes ago. Initially making a name for himself editing the Codex Bezae Cantabrigiensis, Scrivener edited several editions of the New Testament and collated the Codex Sinaiticus with the Textus Receptus. Textus Receptus Definition The King James Version of the Bible, the best-selling Bible of all time, was translated using the Textus Receptus. Second, they use the Codex to show that several key parts of the New Testament showing the deity of Messiah are absent, and the Codex is more original. Sinaiticus has moved with compassion, splanchnistheis in Greek, and not angry as you write. One other omission in Codex Sinaiticus with theological implications is the reference to Jesus ascension in Luke 24:51. Who has bound the waters in His garments? It would enshrine the abominable concept that the church was without the most correct text for 1600 years. What about the recognized theory that John is the first gospel written? BeDuhn points out that the general public and many Bible scholars assume that the differences in the New World Translation (NW) are due to religious bias on the part of its translators. If not, then the art critics interpretation is, From a Byzantine priority (Traditional Christian Church Textus Receptus reading) perspective, the Washingtonianus manuscript and the other early Alexandrian Uncials testify in favor of the early and consistent underlying text found within the Majority of Greek New Testament manuscripts. I had looked at a photo of the end of 2 Cor 13 in the CS, and it ended with verse 13, and the English translation on that same web page showed it ending with what we know as verse 13. Thank you. gr. Compare differences between the King James Version and Codex Sinaiticus. -> Proverbs 8:22 The Lord possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old. Tyndale? A court is not the appropriate place to prove or disprove the authenticity of old manuscripts. Read Edward F. Hills Believing Bible Study. It cuts to the heart in a way the other versions never did. Ask yourself this. Ancient manuscripts? There is nothing when and how Mary Magdalena saw the Risen Christ, indicating, of course, it never happened. Want to check this next time you are with friends, turn on a tape recorder, not tell others you have done so. Set it in stone rag. Its as if phrases were added with reckless abandon. What is his assessment? According to James Bentley, Tischendorf was not troubled by the omission of the resurrection in Mark because he believed that Matthew was written first and that Marks gospel was an abridged version of Matthews gospel. Vat., Vat. -Thus proving anything Godly about Christianity is bogus.. If these two represent an older and more original text, how come they differ from each other so much? Makes me cringe if it really is the best and the oldest. How else could it be that no copies of these manuscripts, not even on small fragments, have been discovered? I believe GOD has preserved his word as he said he would . The Codex Sinaiticus appears to have the reading (as opposed to of the Textus Receptus) with some marks above it. At least to me this discussion thread is very interesting but I always skip the comments that bash another religion or denomination especially when they lack charity and sound scholarship. The Textus Receptus is the text which the King James translators used. Modern scholarship generally holds that Mark is in fact the oldest of the Synoptic Gospels, which could cause theological concerns over the omitted resurrection. So is the conclusion of the Lords Prayer: For thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever. For obvious reasons, the Textus Receptus is also referred to as the "Majority Text" since the majority (95% or more) of existing manuscripts support this reading. Other versions like the Codex Sinaiticus have but one or two manuscripts, so despite the age and missing content versus the KJV Bible, one needs to only weigh the odds of which versions seems likely to be more correct. Codex Vaticanus, gathering dust in the Vatican library since the 1500s and Codex Sinaiticus, rescued from a trash can in St. Catherines monasteryused by Westcott and Hort to rewrite the KJV. In the end days, knowledge shall increase. The person who wrote this is obviously undereducated read Mark 16:6!!! But for the Roman and Orthodox churches there would be no Latin or Greek scripture (on which all translations depend). Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea at the time of Jesus Christs death. Two men who did not believe the scriptures were inerrant, who conducted seances, who did not believe in the miracles of Christ and who were enamored of Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution. Kevin, thanks for this insight, Unfortunately, the comments section that follow the article remind us that anti-Catholic bigotry and the ignorance from which it springs is still present in the minds and hearts of fundamentalist Christians. These two facts should be enough to get your mind thinking whether you have made a right judgement in your comment proving anything Godly about Christianity is bogus It would be understandable to me if the KJV (published in 1611) had been the first English translation. They had Jesus , no need even if they could have, to commit what was being said to memory. Recently found my way back to God, after researching for many, many years other types of religions/beleifs. And how about the epistle of Barnabas and the Shepherd of Hermas? And we have very good reason, from Pauls letters, most of which are accepted as authentic even by non-Christian scholars, that the earliest disciples believed that they had seen the risen Jesus on multiple independent occasions and were willing to die for that belief. Westcott and Hort highly valued the Romish texts -Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, as well as the doctrines of Rome above Protestant doctrine though they were publicly involved in the Protestant church. 4 I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; 2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine. Take a look at these two English translations. Such a production line was slow and laborious and costly. Jesus was hauled before Pilate for the Jewish religious Elite wanted Him dead, because they charged Jesus with blaspemy. What have you got to lose? Nowhere does the OT say; He was with God in the beginning. They play both sides sometimes it is original and sometimes not. Mark 1.41 MISTAKE. Why dont you ask GOD for the understanding. People will accept critical change if it appears in small and harmless doses. Please give a link that is based on literature and that would show the inauthenticity of Codex Sinaiticus. (re Luke. 3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. Two hundred years after Constantine Tischendorfs birth, questions remain as to the conditions of his removal of Codex Sinaiticus from St. Catherines Monastery. There is really no difference in the basic doctrinal message and only a few details are really differentnothing that would affect anyones faith or salvation. The only Greek manuscript with that reading is the bilingual Codex Bezae (D/05) from the V century. Hooray for the proponents of Sinaiticus and Vaticanus. These all have been traced (by liberal and conservative scholars alike) to a probable source in Alexandria, Egypt, in the 2nd or 3rd century. members of one of the over 30,000 versions of Christianity (aka: denominations) none of this has any meaning, because believers follow their beliefs, not facts. the textual variant Jesus, angry, stretched out his hand and touched him is in the Codex Bezae, not in the Codex Sinaticus. https://books.google.com/books/about/In_the_Beginning.html?id=C8Nw_SN2zgYC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button#v=onepage&q&f=false. The Good Friday reading indeed ends with Sore afraid were they for. Not difficult to imagine the copying at an Imperial scriptorium soon after Christianity became Romes state religion. These . When the film was made the producers had to create the speach as no one remembered what brooks had said. One said to the other of the Textus Receptus Think of that vile Textus Receptus leaning entirely on late MSS. It should be noted, for starters, that the four pages containing Mark 15:54b-Luke 1:56a were not produced by the same copyist who wrote the text on the surrounding pages. In my own experience, for over thirty years, when I have raised the question of what is the correct Greek text of the New Testament, regardless of audience, the usual response has been: What difference does it make? The purpose of this article is to answer that question, at least in part. (APPENDIX II, A COMPARISON BETWEEN SIX MAJOR BIBLE VERSIONS, VOLUME II, UNHOLY HANDS ON THE BIBLE. Additionally, Mark 1:1 in the original hand omits reference to Jesus as the Son of God.. Burgon, a supporter of the Textus Receptus, suggested that Codex Sinaiticus, as well as codices Vaticanus and Codex Bezae, were the most corrupt documents extant. One such scholar is Jason David BeDuhn, associate professor of religious studies at Northern Arizona University in the United States. What does it say? Nevertheless, for many readers and contributors to this forum, there are things in that entry which they might not agree with; others might not bat an eye. I recommend The forging of Codex Siniaticus by Bill Cooper. Thanks hope i will learn alot in this websiteBut i want to ask who translated The Amplified bible version? Hope this is helpful to prevent some misunderstandings. And presto, what do we have today? https://www.faraboveall.com/015_Textual/SPLIT%20TEXTS_JETS_current.pdf. One night some sheepherders were sitting around the campfire.. just cant hold a candle to And there were shepherds abiding in the fields, keeping watch over their flocks by night.. Codex Sinaiticus (A) Codex Sinaiticus discovered from the Monastery of Saint Catherine at Sinai 1844. The woman caught in adultery from John 8 is omitted in Codex Sinaiticus. That reading is also found in a few Old Latin mss of the Gospels. If you deny God, then you are truly out of His will and are dead already. May a non-Christian, nonJewish reader of no particular faith point out that you would seem a much greater tribute to your respective Catholic and Protestant faiths were you to behave with more charity to each other and, with good will, attempt to dissipate all odium theologicum, replacing it with a more expansive spirit of brotherly/sisterly love and respect? Earlier? I want to cringe. See Dr Bill Cooper PhD, ThD, The Forging of the Codex Sinaiticus and New Testament Fragments. In it we are given this assurance: The green grass dries up, the blossom withers, but the word of our God endures forever. (Isaiah 40:8; 1 Peter 1:25) The version known as the Peshitta plays a humble but important role in the accurate transmission of the Bibles message to all of humanity
Where To Buy Koegel Hot Dogs In Florida,
Mexiko Giftige Tiere Im Meer,
Dr Sean Mcfadden Car Accident,
Toastmasters Speech Contest 2022,
Articles T